Improving idle behavior in tickless systems
Improving idle behavior in tickless systems
Posted Dec 31, 2018 21:37 UTC (Mon) by corbet (editor, #1)In reply to: Improving idle behavior in tickless systems by rweikusat2
Parent article: Improving idle behavior in tickless systems
I'm sorry, but I think you're trying a little too hard here.
An individual interrupt is not predictable, but, as with the weather, a prediction that "things will happen in the future much like they have in the recent past" is relatively likely to be true. Interrupts are not quantum events, they are the result of the workload and the environment that the system is in. So there is value in a heuristic that looks at residency times and predicts that something similar will happen next.
Perhaps it's time to give this a rest?
