Linux in mixed-criticality systems [LWN.net]

Linux in mixed-criticality systems

Posted Dec 14, 2018 17:33 UTC (Fri) by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
In reply to: Linux in mixed-criticality systems by smurf
Parent article: Linux in mixed-criticality systems

mandatory != safety critical

Central locks and rear cameras are "real-time" (for some definition of it) but really not safety critical.

to post comments

Linux in mixed-criticality systems

Posted Dec 20, 2018 6:26 UTC (Thu) by JdGordy (subscriber, #70103) [Link] (1 responses)

pretty sure there is a requirement for rear cameras to turn on within ~2s of power, and quite likely there is actual safety critical requirements on central locking (if fitted obviously) around how they work in accidents

Linux in mixed-criticality systems

Posted Dec 20, 2018 6:39 UTC (Thu) by marcH (subscriber, #57642) [Link]

My car doesn't have a rear camera, so it must be critically unsafe.

Check what it takes to open a damaged car door.

ABS when fitted is a good example considering its job is to ... release the brakes. Cruise control and any other sort of self driving feature are other obvious ones. Can't wait for the fun of seeing these interact with security holes and other bugs in the media player. As usual the only winners will be the lawyers.