Fedora reawakens the hibernation debate
Fedora reawakens the hibernation debate
Posted Oct 9, 2018 16:22 UTC (Tue) by mcortese (guest, #52099)In reply to: Fedora reawakens the hibernation debate by Cyberax
Parent article: Fedora reawakens the hibernation debate
I see so many ways this approach can fail.
Mounting root... But root could be in a non-clean state.
Initramfs... So now systemd or GNOME depends on Initramfs? Last time I checked, Debian packages had no dependence on a specific version of the kernel. Or on the existence of a boot partition or of a specific bootloader.
In fact I have run a Debian system for years (systemd & GNOME) with no initramfs, no boot partition except EFI, and no bootloader. I guess I'd better think twice before upgrading to GNOME 3.30... :)
The LWN site is currently under high scraper load, so comment display has been suppressed for anonymous users. If you are a human, you may read the comments by clicking the button below:
Note: you can avoid this step in the future by logging into your LWN account.