|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

A different way to focus discussions

From:  Guido van Rossum <guido-AT-python.org>
To:  python-committers <python-committers-AT-python.org>
Subject:  A different way to focus discussions
Date:  Fri, 18 May 2018 15:25:37 -0700
Message-ID:  <CAP7+vJJ-BUjHjtDShnEKBWDe=vW_RwqfEZH4Um6yxcp=oAJAHw@mail.gmail.com>
Archive-link:  Article

Discussing PEPs on python-dev and python-ideas is clearly not scalable any
more. (Even python-committers probably doesn't scale too well. :-)

I wonder if it would make sense to require that for each PEP a new GitHub
*repo* be created whose contents would just be a draft PEP and whose issue
tracker and PR manager would be used to debate the PEP and propose specific
changes.

This way the discussion is still public: when the PEP-specific repo is
created the author(s) can notify python-ideas, and when they are closer to
submitting they can notify python-dev, but the discussion doesn't attract
uninformed outsiders as much as python-{dev,ideas} discussions do, and it's
much easier for outsiders who want to learn more about the proposal to find
all relevant discussion.

PEP authors may also choose to use a different repo hosting site, e.g.
Bitbucket or GitLab. We can provide a script that allows checking the
formatting of the PEP easily (basically pep2html.py from the peps repo).

Using a separate repo per PEP has the advantage that people interested in a
topic can subscribe to all traffic in that repo -- if we were to use the
tracker of the peps repo you would have to subscribe to all peps traffic.

Thoughts? (We can dogfood this proposal too, if there's interest. :-)

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)


to post comments


Copyright © 2018, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds