|From:||Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-osdl.org>|
|To:||Nick Piggin <piggin-AT-cyberone.com.au>|
|Subject:||Re: [RFC] kref, a tiny, sane, reference count object|
|Date:||Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:10:17 -0800|
|Cc:||greg-AT-kroah.com, linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, ak-AT-suse.de|
Nick Piggin <email@example.com> wrote: > > > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > >Greg KH <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > > >>For all of those people, this patch is for you. > >> > > > >It does rather neatly capture a common idiom. > > > > But as Andi said - look at all the crap involved when: > > atomic_inc(); > if (atomic_dec_and_test()) > release(); > Also neatly captures that idiom. Well it does more than that, such as trapping the hard-to-diagnose bug of grabbing a refcount against a zero-ref object. > And you get more flexibility by being able to use atomic_set > directly too. Do I care about that? I care more about being able to say "ah, it uses kref. I understand that refcounting idiom, I know it's well debugged and I know that it traps common errors". That's better than "oh crap, this thing implements its own refcounting - I need to review it for the usual errors". - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Copyright © 2004, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds