| From: |
| Hanno Böck <hanno-60OJuG18Xr6zQB+pC5nmwQ-AT-public.gmane.org> |
| To: |
| oss-security-ZwoEplunGu1jrUoiu81ncdBPR1lH4CV8-AT-public.gmane.org |
| Subject: |
| beep infoleak |
| Date: |
| Sun, 8 Apr 2018 10:11:47 +0200 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20180408101147.505cd109@pc1> |
Hi,
It's been found that beep - even after the fix for "holey beep" - can
be used to create an infoleak and to see which files exist with root
permissions:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895115
Also there are Integer Overflows:
https://github.com/johnath/beep/issues/13
Also Sebastian Krahmer pointed out the fix is incomplete:
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q2/17
All of that without an existing upstream.
I question whether beep should be saved. It would require someone
carefully reviewing the code and effectively become the new upstream.
And all that for a tool talking to the PC speaker, which doesn't exist
in most modern systems anyway. Instead distros should consider not
installing it as suid or just killing the package altogether.
I heard some distros (suse) replace beep with a simple "printf '\a'"
which seems also a safe solution. (although it obviously kills all
frequency/length/etc features of original "beep").
--
Hanno Böck
https://hboeck.de/
mail/jabber: hanno-60OJuG18Xr6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org
GPG: FE73757FA60E4E21B937579FA5880072BBB51E42