|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

DIY biology

By Jake Edge
February 14, 2018

linux.conf.au

A scientist with a rather unusual name, Meow-Ludo Meow-Meow, gave a talk at linux.conf.au 2018 about the current trends in "do it yourself" (DIY) biology or "biohacking". He is perhaps most famous for being prosecuted for implanting an Opal card RFID chip into his hand; the Opal card is used for public transportation fares in Sydney. He gave more details about his implant as well as describing some other biohacking projects in an engaging presentation.

Meow-Meow is a politician with the Australian Science Party, he said by way of introduction; he has run in the last two elections. He founded BioFoundry, which is "Australia's first open-access molecular biology lab"; there are now two such labs in the country. He is also speaks frequently as "an emerging technology evangelist" for biology as well as other topics.

Background

Biohacking was started in response to the belief that academia is slow and expensive. The knowledge and thinking is "siloed"; people on the same floor of an academic facility may not know that they are working on the same problems. It excludes people who have an interest but lack the higher degree that is considered required.

So biohacking came about because non-professionals wanted to participate in molecular biology, he said, but didn't want to do "citizen science". Going out and collecting data points for "real" scientists so they can publish papers "is boring". The biohacker movement wants to turn citizen science into "civic science".

[Meow-Ludo Meow-Meow]

The civic science term came about during the Fukushima disaster when MIT Media Lab director Joichi Ito ("who also doesn't have a degree, by the way") was trying to figure out how to use hacking and hackers (in the original sense of the term) to help out. There are things that hackers do well, such as moving quickly and thinking outside of the box, that might be applied to the problems faced by the disaster victims.

Out of that came Safecast, which was an important moment for Meow-Meow because Safecast made the transition from citizen to civic science for him. The Japanese government ran out of Geiger counters and other devices to measure the radiation levels from the disaster, so Safecast worked with hackers to build their own—reducing the cost from $6000 to $600. These devices were then used to measure radiation levels throughout the region. This was civic science because the users were doing more than just collecting data points; they were also interpreting and processing the data and making decisions based on it. The maps generated by the project were much better than any others, to the point that the government adopted them after three months.

Having all of this open data led to innovation, he said. He showed a video of a biohacker from Fukushima who linked the color of some lights in the wheel of his bicycle to one of the Geiger counters. So as he traveled around at night, he could get an idea of the radiation level of the area.

Biohacking consists of microbiology, molecular biology, building your own equipment, bioinformatics, and grinding, which is "the act of putting technology inside your body". Some of that might be done in an academic setting, but in general it is not. Biohacking takes a more "tinkering kind of approach", rather than "hypothesis-driven" as academia tends to be.

He founded BioFoundry three or more years ago and "it has been a wild journey". The first BioFoundry lab was in a small space in an artist coop near the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) campus where LCA was held, Meow-Meow said. He and some folks that he had been meeting with for several years gathered equipment out of dumpsters and built some other equipment for the 16m2 lab. The space was pretty dodgy and they outgrew it quickly, but "the cool thing is we were doing some really fun science".

Two iterations later, the lab is larger and better equipped. The lab has Physical Containment 1 certification, which allows researchers to work with viruses and "hack bacteria". The certification "enables us to do most of the cool things except genetic modification on plants", he said.

Biohacking projects

The key project being worked on currently at BioFoundry is Open Insulin, which was started by another biohacking group in Oakland, CA. Biohacking is generally aimed at making the world or people better, he said; Open Insulin is about "making open-source insulin" using processes that are not covered by patents. Insulin used to be made in pig pancreases, but is now mostly made by bacteria that have been combined with a human gene. Prices of insulin are going up and production of it is going down, to the point that people in third-world countries and even China do not have access to it, which is "criminal", Meow-Meow said.

He then took attendees on a bit of whirlwind tour through some of the projects that are being done in the biohacking world. David Ishee is a dog breeder in the US who has become "one of the best biohackers in the world". He wants to fix genetic errors in dog breeds, many of which were introduced by humans using selective breeding. Ishee has run into problems with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) trying to classify what he is doing as creating drugs, "which is completely bizarre". At the time of the talk, the US government was (briefly) shut down, which made Ishee "very excited", Meow-Meow said, to a round of laughter.

Sascha Karberg is a biohacker who had a problem with waking up each morning to fresh dog poop on his lawn. "Instead of doing what any normal person would do, he decided to overengineer the solution to the problem". He took tennis balls to the local dog park and threw them for each dog, collected the saliva from them, and did basic DNA sequencing on each at a local biohacking space. After sequencing the poop, he was able to find out which dog was making the mess, confront the owner, and stop the poop problem. It is an example, Meow-Meow said with a chuckle, of how biohacking can be used to solve a problem.

Another part of the biohacking movement is the creation of equipment to be used as part of the experiments or for data collection. People who can write code, do electronics, or run a laser cutter can contribute to efforts at local biohacker spaces to build this equipment. Much of it is "upcycled computer gear"; instead of a basic setup costing $20-30,000, it can "be built for like 500 bucks", he said.

Another way that people without a biology background can help is in providing ways for visualizing the data. Some of his favorite projects are ones where people from different skill sets get together to see what problems they can solve. One of those is a river watch project [Google Translate link] by an Indonesian group called Lifepatch [Google Translate]. The group made simple coliform bacteria detectors that were used to measure the amount of sewage reaching various waterways. That data is collected and displayed so that people can determine which parts of the rivers are safe to drink from. Each biohacker space in the world seems to focus on a different kind of problem, he said.

Another example is Josiah Zayner, who is "solving very different problems". He had a problem with his digestive tract, so he did a fecal transplant, which was so successful that he quit his job with NASA to do molecular biology full time. Zayner is perhaps most famous for his web site "The ODIN", where he sells reagents and kits to anyone as part of the "democratization of science" movement. He got in trouble with the EU for shipping CRISPR kits for bacteria to Germany; the EU claimed he was shipping pathogenic E. coli bacteria, but that turned out not to be the case. Zayner also has kits for use on humans ("though I wouldn't recommend that"); Zayner has used the kit on himself, however.

We are at the point where "lots and lots of people" are doing experiments using CRISPR, he said; it is "a brave new world". A "kind of sad story" is that of Tristan Roberts, who is infected with HIV. Roberts was frustrated about the advent of various experimental drugs for treating HIV that he did not have access to. So he recently injected himself with a therapy that looks promising and stopped taking his anti-HIV medication (Meow-Meow said that discontinuing the medicine was not popular in biohacking circles). It is too early to know the results, but there are a number of ethical questions that arise: should Roberts be allowed to do that? What if people in a country with socialized medicine start treating themselves that way; should the medical system be required to cover that?

Opal implant

Meow-Meow then moved on to his experiments on himself. The Opal card, like other RFID cards, consists of a chip and an antenna. The antenna is quite long in the card because it goes around the edge of the card many times. RFID works by the terminal providing an RF field that causes power to be generated by induction in the antenna that then powers the chip; the terminal and the chip can also communicate via the RF. When he first started talking with folks about implanting the Opal chip, it was the antenna that everyone thought would be the biggest problem. He actually has three different implants at this point (two for Opal, one other). One Opal implant is in his thumb, but doesn't work well because the antenna is not the right shape to interact with the Opal terminals.

So getting the right antenna was key, but the designer of the antenna, Amal Graafstra, lives in Seattle, which made it somewhat time-consuming to do. Graafstra started trying out different kinds of antennas, some of which ended up in some his own implant projects. Graafstra eventually settled on a small (roughly 3x1cm) printed circuit board with the antenna looping at one end; the Opal chip was dissolved out of the card with acetone and soldered to the board. The board was laminated with a bio-compatible plastic coating and was implanted into the side of Meow-Meow's hand on the side opposite his thumb.

Meow-Meow showed video of using the implant in his hand at an Opal terminal. After that video appeared on television, "I got in trouble", he said. The Sydney transit authority wanted to cancel the chip in his hand, which made him leery of actually using it. When the Opal system was first put in place, various folks asked why the transit authority needed to collect personal information as part of the sign-up process. The agency said "you can trust us, we'll never misuse your data", but "the first fucking chance they got to misuse my data, they did" by shutting down a different Opal card that he had in his name—on the day he did the TV story.

He said that he personally does not trust the government with his metadata "as far as I can throw them". But this incident does give him a way to talk about metadata retention as part of his campaign in the next election cycle. It is a good demonstration of why governments should not be allowed to retain metadata. Due to his offense (having an invalid ticket, which carries a $200 fine), he has to go to court on March 16. It will be the "first cyborg law case in Australia", he said with a grin; "it will be a bit exciting".

The other implant he has is a "little glass bead" in his hand. It is similar to the identification chips that some dogs and cats have and was also designed by Graafstra. In the future, Graafstra will be selling the VivoKey, which has roughly the same form factor as Meow-Meow's Opal implant, but will do two-factor authentication. The VivoKey has a megabyte of space, "which is huge"; the chip in his thumb has 868 bytes of storage by comparison.

He pointed to an article in ScienceDaily about the longevity of batteries in devices such as pacemakers (foreshadowing, a bit, Karen Sandler's keynote later in the week). The incentives for device makers are to reduce the warranties on battery life in order to make more money, he said, since "they can't make people more sick". The medical cost to replace a pacemaker battery in the US is $135,000, so he thinks we will see more efforts by patients and others to find alternatives. If someone gets an "off-brand" battery, though, will that violate the terms of service or warranty of their pacemaker? There will be many ethical and other questions along those lines in the near future, he thinks.

There are also efforts underway to implant more functional computers, with sensors, actuators, and wifi/Bluetooth communication, rather than the relatively dumb RFID devices. Beyond that are implants for decoration, like an LED implant that displays moving star patterns under the skin. Or using implanted magnets coupled with external sensors to simulate the echolocation ability of dolphins. And so on. The people behind these kinds of projects would seem to agree with the "Bioquisitive" slogan on Meow-Meow's t-shirt. He encouraged anyone so inclined to get involved with BioFoundry or their local biohacker space to "help us make cool science".

In the Q&A session, he noted that his Opal implants were not something he was going to keep permanently, but that they had opened up an interesting conversation. The Opal chips are proprietary, which is what the audience member was asking about but, he asked, why do they need to be? If he wins his court case, he thinks that will change how people are allowed to interact with this technology.

The advantages of an implant over the card or other mechanisms are numerous, he said. "It is 100 times cooler to implant it than to wear it". He can't lose the implant and he can swim with it. In addition, it is not obvious that he even has it, so people wouldn't even necessarily think to steal it (which would also be hard, of course).

There are some tricky ethics and safety questions surrounding these uncontrolled biohacker labs, he said. But the BioFoundry lab is subject to the same regulations as any other lab. BioFoundry works directly with the government and informs it of what the lab is doing. That may or may not be true for other labs, however.

A YouTube video of the talk is available.

[I would like to thank LWN's travel sponsor, the Linux Foundation, for travel assistance to Sydney for LCA.]

Index entries for this article
Conferencelinux.conf.au/2018


to post comments

DIY biology

Posted Feb 15, 2018 22:39 UTC (Thu) by ballombe (subscriber, #9523) [Link] (4 responses)

> hackers (in the original sense of the term)

LWN should not need to have to add this clarification.
Alas, hackers is one of the most oppressed minority in the press.
If the name of any other minority was hijacked to design criminals, people would be up in arm.

DIY biology

Posted Feb 15, 2018 23:22 UTC (Thu) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link] (1 responses)

People are hackers by choice, whereas most minorities that we think of as oppressed have no choice in the matter. It's incredibly tasteless to compare the two situations.

DIY biology

Posted Feb 16, 2018 15:34 UTC (Fri) by robbe (guest, #16131) [Link]

I agree with choice being an important distinction. I don't find the comparison tasteless, though.

If I'm of Afghan, Irish, or Jewish descent I can try to disguise/downplay this fact to escape rascism. But I sure as hell shouldn't need to!

If I subscribe to hacker, marxist, anarchist ideology, I should be able to say that without people painting me as a bad person, just because some bad persons self-identify as hacker/marxist/anarchist.

DIY biology

Posted Feb 16, 2018 12:09 UTC (Fri) by tao (subscriber, #17563) [Link] (1 responses)

You mean like skinheads and punks?

DIY biology

Posted Feb 16, 2018 19:30 UTC (Fri) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784) [Link]

Skinhead, I'll grant you; white power skinheads are only one subset of skinheads, but they're what people default to assuming you mean by the unadorned word.

Punk, I have to dispute. The derogatory uses of the word (dating back as far as the 16th century; it can be found in the works of Shakespeare) are far older than the appropriation of the term as a subcultural badge.

DIY biology

Posted Feb 16, 2018 15:24 UTC (Fri) by eru (subscriber, #2753) [Link] (5 responses)

I don't understand this urge to implant electronics to oneself without a serious medical reason. Everyone knows electronics becomes quickly obsolete, so with implants, each upgrade becomes a surgical operation. In a world with antibiotics resistant bacteria, every sane person avoids surgery as much as possible.

DIY biology

Posted Feb 16, 2018 22:16 UTC (Fri) by tedd (subscriber, #74183) [Link] (1 responses)

Why not implant a compartment of sorts, where implantation does not require surgery?

DIY biology

Posted Feb 18, 2018 5:46 UTC (Sun) by k8to (guest, #15413) [Link]

Either you allow the skin to seal, in which case there's still surgery, or you don't in which case there's a constant infection risk.

DIY biology

Posted Feb 18, 2018 15:20 UTC (Sun) by niner (guest, #26151) [Link] (1 responses)

In a world with antibiotics resistant bacteria, every sane person would use antibiotics only for treating severe medical conditions in humans. Yet 80 % of all antibiotics are in fact consumed by food animals [1]. Of the almost negligible use on humans, about half is administered without necessity at all or with inappropriate antibiotic selection, dosing, and duration [2].

Really, it does not matter at all if some bio hackers do some unnecessary surgery. And JFTR, I'm not one of them.

[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/grrlscientist/2017/09/29/a-p...
[2] https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/community/about/fast-f...

DIY biology

Posted Feb 18, 2018 23:59 UTC (Sun) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784) [Link]

I don't think eru was talking about the collective risk from misuse and overuse of antibiotics, but rather about the individual risk from unnecessary surgery in a world where antibiotics have already been misused/overused.

DIY biology

Posted Mar 3, 2018 17:48 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

Quite. Also, we are not yet very good at immune-neutral compartments, so either an implant is actually within the skin or it'll become a locus of inflammation, scar tissue, and pain. I cannot imagine what would possess anyone not a medical professional to try implantation, frankly (but part of this may be because I've had serious medical problems myself so envisage the body as a fragile thing).

Not only does technology become obsolete quickly, but, well, look at the VivoKey. It's an authenticator. What do you do when it has a firmware vulnerability? Either its firmware is flashable over the air (in which case it is likely axiomatically insecure and should not be used as an authenticator) or it is not (in which case replacement means surgery). This would, of course, never happen! Authentication systems are totally secure and authenticators made by people obsessed with such things would not have vulns. Oh wait the YubiKey has had two in the last five years, neither things one could blame on them being slipshod: one was in an upstream project and one of which was in the chip they used in the key. I do not trust the VivoKey to be more secure than the YubiKey, not really, which means surgery every few years to fix the damn thing (and an attacker can *still* impersonate you by just threatening you until you authenticate for them, or cutting off the relevant body part if they are real heartless bastards).

I'd rather just put it on my keyring. It's amazing how rarely that gets inflamed, or I need it surgically replaced.

DIY biology

Posted Feb 19, 2018 18:12 UTC (Mon) by dvrabel (guest, #9500) [Link]

Opal Card terms and conditions, paragraph 8. "Property of TfNSW".

Meow-Meow is incorrect in thinking his Opal card court case has anything to with "cyborg law".

DIY biology: Ready for Prime Time or Just Self Abuse

Posted Feb 21, 2018 17:55 UTC (Wed) by brzuckerman (guest, #121793) [Link] (1 responses)

Really? Is this stuff worthy of LWN? Zayner has already recanted his position on the subject and the use of CRISPR. Which part of biohazards are we missing? Yes, it is just hacking oneself. But this isn't mere software where you can rehack, compile, and run again. What is a human OOPS or core dump?

DIY biology: Ready for Prime Time or Just Self Abuse

Posted Feb 26, 2018 21:42 UTC (Mon) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link]

Human OOPSes happens all the time. Déjà vu, walking into a room and forgetting why you're there, repeating words, forgetting what you were about to say, and so on.

Some typical causes of human core dumps include are SIGILL (bad food or too much alcohol), SIGPIPE (disrupted plumbing), and SIGCHLD (self-explanatory).

DIY biology

Posted Feb 22, 2018 12:29 UTC (Thu) by Wol (subscriber, #4433) [Link] (1 responses)

> So he recently injected himself with a therapy that looks promising and stopped taking his anti-HIV medication (Meow-Meow said that discontinuing the medicine was not popular in biohacking circles). It is too early to know the results, but there are a number of ethical questions that arise: should Roberts be allowed to do that? What if people in a country with socialized medicine start treating themselves that way; should the medical system be required to cover that?

Actually, this is both acceptable AND EXPECTED behaviour for doctors - certainly in the past they were expected to try out their cures on themselves.

Okay a lot of them didn't, but those that used their own illnesses for scientific experiment are generally praised in the literature.

Cheers,
Wol

DIY biology

Posted Mar 3, 2018 17:39 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

Also, medical systems routinely cover people who drink too much and injure themselves, lung cancer in smokers, self-harm in people with various mental disorders, etc. Some estimates have *most* expenditure by such systems going on people who've done things that eventually harmed them (not least because some of these people tend to do it repeatedly and become frequent visitors to the local emergency room).

This is all not terribly surprising, given the number and variety of things that can harm you and the fact that nobody knows all of them: eventually, everyone who does anything at all will end up doing this by accident, though most will not be repeat visitors. Almost nothing you can do to yourself is remotely as dangerous as breathing air, in any case.

DIY biology

Posted Mar 3, 2018 17:28 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

So I was wondering why he adopted that name, since the Australian Science Party appears to be a serious, if small, party with praiseworthy aims, and not, say, something like the Monster Raving Loony Party where having candidates with names that make you laugh every time you say them is part of the point. But I note that not only is his full name (Meow-Ludo Disco Gamma Meow-Meow) going to generate hits for nobody but him when you google it, even his first name on its own appears to be web-unique.

This is a vanishingly-rare property for personal names, so may well be worth doing if you plan to be in the public eye and not in a position so straitlaced that going around with a name like Meow-Ludo won't detract from what you're doing (and in this case it probably enhances it). It's certainly worth having one person give it a try.


Copyright © 2018, Eklektix, Inc.
This article may be redistributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY-SA 4.0 license
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds