Your comments are all true, however you do talk about the "next generation" of email clients. In such a comparison, the latest (supposedly much improved) version of Outlook would be interesting. I do understand the reason that Outlook XP/2000 is included. I also understand the lack of interest in paying a lot of money for the latest version of Outlook just to be able to include it in this article ;)
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds