|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Development quotes of the week

It should be noted that, like all the principles being described here, the commitment to inclusive software can be a source of conflict, particularly around usability. Members of the GNOME project have had to repeatedly fight in the name of inclusive software, something which they continue to do to this day. It is a constant cultural tension, between those who would make software only for technically-inclined people like themselves, and those who would make software that takes others into account. For some, the fact that GNOME stands up for this principle is a reason to see it in an unfavourable light. However, for me, it is one of the reasons why GNOME matters.
Allan Day

What I'd like to see with the board, the TC, the UC, and anyone else who wants to participate is a calm retrospective of the last three, six or twelve months. So we can see where we need to go from here. We can share some accolades and, if necessary, air some grievances. Someone can say "there's a rough edge here" so someone else with a lot of spare sandpaper they thought was useless can say "I can help with that". We might even sing Kum ba yah.
Chris Dent

to post comments

can we dial back the hyperbolic rhetoric please?

Posted Aug 25, 2017 6:02 UTC (Fri) by Garak (guest, #99377) [Link] (1 responses)

Members of the GNOME project have had to repeatedly fight in the name of inclusive software, something which they continue to do to this day. It is a constant cultural tension, between those who would make software only for technically-inclined people like themselves, and those who would make software that takes others into account.
While I have no interest in arguing the details of this issue, I have to at least comment that a truly enlightened view would emphasize the wonders of freely forking as an alternative to this 'fighting' Day speaks of. And further, the implication that the itch-scratchers all are some kind of bullies that the poor innocent GNOMErs have to fend off the violent attacks of, is... yeah, excessively hyperbolic. Sigh, now I have to try to outquote the quote with Rush lyrics (Hemispheres)
We can walk our road together
If our goals are all the same
We can run alone and free
If we pursue a different aim

Let the truth of love be lighted
Let the love of truth shine clear
Sensibility, armed with sense and liberty
With the heart and mind united in a single perfect sphere

can we dial back the hyperbolic rhetoric please?

Posted Aug 25, 2017 6:32 UTC (Fri) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]

If you can fight to convince others that one approach is preferable then you gain from the work that they can provide as a result. Even if the effort you put in to convince one person is greater than the work they contribute back, avoiding a fork may still be a net win in terms of attracting other developers rather than having people work on multiple forks.

The freedom to fork is a fundamental part of free software, and we certainly shouldn't view the exercise of that freedom as a failure. But when it *is* possible to convince people to work together on a single project rather than forking, free software gains by producing a single project with a wider range of involvement. It's wrong to condemn forks without understanding of the reasoning behind them, but it's also wrong to celebrate forks without determining whether more willingness to find a commonly acceptable outcome could have avoided duplicated effort.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds