|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Giving Upspin a spin

Giving Upspin a spin

Posted Mar 12, 2017 16:41 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
In reply to: Giving Upspin a spin by HIGHGuY
Parent article: Giving Upspin a spin

Also *far* higher resource consumption (CPU due to proof-of-work, disk space and network bandwidth due to storing the thing) and probably a very low system-wide maximum transaction rate, at least if blockchains are implemented anything like the Bitcoin one.

Blockchains are not a good fit for this problem. (They look like a terrible fit, actually. Why do you need nonrepudiability of fs operations? Why do you need it so much that you're willing to pay blockchain's enormous costs?)


to post comments

Giving Upspin a spin

Posted Mar 12, 2017 18:58 UTC (Sun) by HIGHGuY (subscriber, #62277) [Link]

I'm only talking about the key servers, everything else is fine as is. It also doesn't exclude central servers doing some form of caching.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds