Re: Introducing the LEDE project

On Thu, 05 May 2016 18:24:09 +0200, Daniel Dickinson  
<openwrt@daniel.thecshore.com> wrote:

> On 16-05-05 12:21 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> [snip]
>>     > The changes that the Lede guys are suggesting would be welcome,  
>> but
>>     > splitting the project and community with an ugly fork is very  
>> much not
>>     > welcome.
>>
>>     Let's just say that there are strong personalities who haven't been
>>     working well together and that this has been a long time coming;  
>> perhaps
>>     if something like using a mediator had been considered before  
>> things got
>>     to this point it would have helped.  At this point I'm not sure
>>     there is a
>>     solution unless both sides are willing to bend a little (I'm really  
>> not
>>     sure who has been flexible and who has not, but as I have said I  
>> suspect
>>     a large part of the issue is that 'management' (who aren't and  
>> don't,
>>     really) has overruled those doing the majority of the work and in an
>>     open source project that doesn't fly).
>>
>> I don't disagree.  I just see the current state of Openwrt/Lede as a
>> mess for the community.
>
> I agree, I just don't see how the LEDE team could have avoided it
> without giving up and accepting the broken status quo.

I hope you realize the LEDE team created most of that status quo.


Imre
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwr...