|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

FSF: Stop DRM in HTML

From:  "Zak Rogoff, FSF" <info-AT-fsf.org>
To:  LWN <lwn-AT-lwn.net>
Subject:  Show them the world is watching. Stop DRM in HTML.
Date:  Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:55:42 -0500
Message-ID:  <E1adTLi-0000IG-U8@crmserver1p.fsf.org>


Dear LWN,

For years, our Defective by Design campaign and the anti-[DRM][1]
movement have been fighting media and proprietary software companies
who want to weave Digital Restrictions Management into the HTML
standard that undergirds the Web. Winning this is a top priority for
us -- the DRM proposal, known as EME (Encrypted Media Extensions),
would make it cheaper and more politically acceptable to impose
restrictions on Web users, opening the floodgates to a new wave of DRM
throughout the Internet.

[1]: https://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm_digital_res...

The battle is coming to a head as EME approaches a final vote by the
Web's standardization organization, the World Wide Web Consortium
(W3C). We need to make our voices heard now -- the W3C is convening
March 20-22 and is scheduled to discuss the proposal. Two things you
can do:

**[1: Sign our petition to demand that the W3C reject the Encrypted
  Media Extensions proposal, and keep DRM out of Web standards.][2]**

[2]: https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/profile/create?gid=183&res...

**2: Pay a visit to a W3C office in your country, and take a protest
  selfie.**

The W3C has twenty global offices on every continent. If you live near
one of them, **you have a unique opportunity to make a difference in
this struggle**. Use your bike, feet, train or car to get to one and
take a photo of yourself with a sign protesting DRM in HTML (try our
[printable sign][3]). We have reliable advice that this will be very
influential to the W3C's leadership -- if they know the whole world is
watching them, it will be much harder for them to take this huge step
backward for the Web. Here's the full list of offices:

[3]: https://static.fsf.org/nosvn/dbd/no-drm-in-html/no-drm-in...

* Acton, Australia
* Amsterdam, The Netherlands
* São Paulo, Brazil
* Tampere, Finland
* Paris, France
* Berlin, Germany
* Heraklion, Greece
* Budapest, Hungary
* Pune, India
* Pisa, Italy
* Daejeon, Korea
* Rabat, Morocco
* Moscow, Russia
* Dakar-Fann, Senegal
* Pretoria, South Africa
* Asturias, Spain
* Kista, Sweden
* Oxford, United Kingdom
* Cambridge, United States
* Kanagawa, Japan

You can find the precise addresses of the offices (except the
[USA's][4] and [Japan's][5]) on [this W3C page][6].

[4]: https://www.w3.org/Consortium/contact-mit
[5]: https://www.w3.org/Consortium/contact-keio
[6]: https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Offices/staff

Please send your pictures to <campaigns@fsf.org> and, if you're on
[social media][7], post them with the hashtag #hollyweb. **To put
pressure on the W3C leading up to its big meeting, make sure to send
us your photos by Thursday, March 17th.**

[7]: https://www.fsf.org/share

We'll share your photos in an online gallery and on March 20th, we'll 
incorporate them into a demonstration outside the central W3C office 
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Yes, this is the 
second day of our [LibrePlanet][8] conference -- and serendipitously, 
the conference and W3C office are in the same building!) If you'd 
like to preserve anonymity, we're happy to blur your face.

[8]: https://www.libreplanet.org/conference

We're also seeking leaders to take it one step further and organize a
demonstration at any global W3C office this month. We'll provide
support with logistics, resources and promotion. Let us know at
<campaigns@fsf.org> if you'd like to work with us!

We have a real chance to win this fight. Many of the W3C's hundreds of
member organizations and staff members stand with us in opposition to
DRM in HTML. A few giant companies, like Microsoft, Netflix, and
Google, are driving the push to add DRM to the HTML standard --
because they're beholden to Hollywood and big media to lock down their
video streams. This comes down to a simple question, which has
repercussions beyond just DRM: **will we have a Web designed for big
media companies and Hollywood -- the Hollyweb -- or a Web that works
for the billions of people around the world that rely on it to
communicate, connect and organize?**

For more information about DRM in HTML, see the [coalition letter][9]
we co-signed with 26 other organizations arguing against the proposal,
the Electronic Frontier Foundation's [blog post on the subject][10],
and the [full text of the proposal itself][11].

[9]: https://www.defectivebydesign.org/sign-on-against-drm-in-...
[10]: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/03/defend-open-web-kee...
[11]: https://w3c.github.io/encrypted-media/

Together, we **will** stop the Hollyweb!

Zak Rogoff  
Campaigns Manager

*Read online:
<https://www.defectivebydesign.org/show-them-the-world-is-...>.*
-- 
* Follow us at <https://status.fsf.org/fsf>. 
* Subscribe to our RSS feeds at <https://fsf.org/blogs/RSS>.
* Join us as an associate member at <https://www.fsf.org/jf>.

Sent from the Free Software Foundation,

51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02110-1335
UNITED STATES




to post comments

FSF: Stop DRM in HTML

Posted Mar 10, 2016 17:18 UTC (Thu) by flussence (guest, #85566) [Link]

I'm grateful that there's at least one entity with a loud enough voice pushing for this, because the few web browsers that could've kept the web open gave in to greed long ago.

FSF: Stop DRM in HTML

Posted Mar 17, 2016 2:27 UTC (Thu) by Garak (guest, #99377) [Link]

the DRM proposal, known as EME (Encrypted Media Extensions), would make it cheaper and more politically acceptable to impose restrictions on Web users, opening the floodgates to a new wave of DRM throughout the Internet.
This is almost an honest question- If there really is this New Wave, and the FSF was granted their wish here in full, would not market forces result in a simple fork of the HTML standard? I just don't quite really believe the FSF is looking at this the right way, which basically means I don't think anyone is. Unless the FSF's master plan involves dictating that their preferred HTML standard is the only allowed hypertext protocol on the internet. Which somehow both seems likely to be true and stupid to me.


Copyright © 2016, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds