the claims
the claims
Posted Jan 26, 2004 19:00 UTC (Mon) by stevenj (guest, #421)Parent article: The Most Hated Company In Tech (Business Week)
The independent claims (the broadest claims) are as follows. In order to invalidate a claim, you need to find prior art that satisfies every stipulation of that claim. (The "publication date" on the patent is listed as 1/2/2004, but I don't know what the priority date is, i.e. the date prior art has to come before...anyone?)
- A computer-readable medium having computer-executable components, comprising:
- a first component for reading a word-processor document stored as a single XML file;
- a second component that utilizes an XSD for interpreting the word-processor document, and
- a third component for performing an action on the word-processor document.
- A method for handling a word-processing document, comprising:
- parsing the document, wherein the document is contained within a single XML file and includes all of the instructions necessary to display the document according to how a word-processor would display the document;
- and interpreting the document according to an XSD.
- A system for creating, interpreting, and modifying a word-processor document stored as as single WPML file, comprising:
- a WPML file;
- a validation engine configured to validate the WPML file; and
- a word processor configured to read a WPML file created in accordance with a schema.
- A computer-readable medium having a schema encoded thereon, for a word-processor markup language, the schema comprising:
- a properties element;
- a styles element;
- a body element, wherein the body element comprises:
- a paragraph element;
- a text run element including text that is the text content of a word-processor document and is defined by a single tag; and
- a table element.
What was the first date OpenOffice.org described its XML usage? Does it satisfy the other elements of the claims, e.g. XSD usage?
