|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Quotes of the week

Given the readability issues caused by overuse of lambda, there's a school of thought that sees "I like lambda functions, but don't like the lambda keyword, so I avoid using lambda expressions in Python" as a desirable characteristic of the status quo.
— Nick Coghlan

In this happy case the source code for ZFS is available, but what about the future, when we aren't so lucky and someone asserts in court that the "you know, the software license was really about the spirit of sharing and that means we are allowed to use it -- and not be held to the pesky details as written in the license".
— Tom Marble is skeptical of the Software Freedom Law Center's analysis of ZFS.

Volunteers don't generally donate their time to solve problems they don't have (and employers don't typically donate their employees' time to solve problems they or their customers don't have), which means "I don't personally have that problem, so I deny its very existence" is almost never a compelling line of argument in a community-driven open source project.
— Nick Coghlan



to post comments

Quotes of the week

Posted Mar 17, 2016 2:01 UTC (Thu) by welinder (guest, #4699) [Link] (1 responses)

I thought python 3 pretty much settled the lambda situation
in the sense that they were neutered so much as to make
them unpleasant to use with the hope that people would cease
to use them.

I am thinking of the bizarre "map" (with functional programming
eyes) semantics and the removal of tuple decomposition.

Quotes of the week

Posted Mar 17, 2016 21:03 UTC (Thu) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link]

Huh? Examples? I've used lambda and map just fine in Python3. Maybe I'm not using them enough (as a sometime Haskell programmer, they are not the end-all-be-all, but they are useful…).

Quotes of the week

Posted Mar 21, 2016 18:44 UTC (Mon) by ksandstr (guest, #60862) [Link]

>(...) "I don't personally have that problem, so I deny its very existence" is almost never a compelling line of argument in a community-driven open source project.

Trivially false: the burden of proof is on the person claiming that a thing exists. Absent such proof, "I don't see it" is quite enough to exclude things such as purple flying unicorns, assuming they don't go invisible of course...

Good use of the weasel word there, however.


Copyright © 2016, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds