Linux Mint downloads (briefly) compromised
Linux Mint downloads (briefly) compromised
Posted Feb 23, 2016 1:59 UTC (Tue) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)In reply to: Linux Mint downloads (briefly) compromised by bournville
Parent article: Linux Mint downloads (briefly) compromised
Well, I think you are. A core part of free and open software is the licensing model. If a distribution ignores licensing, they are muddying the waters and that feeds into the FUD about open source having weak "IP" foundations. This affects users in unexpected ways. We have been through the SCO debacle despite it being smoke and mirrors and let's not forget that too quickly.
>Most potential end users don't even realize there is a licensing issue, just as they > don't realize that they may not be getting the best software update management solution
Which is why it is important to educate users rather than ignoring it. This is LWN after all. It is fine to ask distributions to understand consumer desktop user needs better if that is the target of the distribution (many if not most distributions aren't) but there are limitations to what can be done. You should note that end users can and often are held liable in many legal issues.
If Linux mint has taken on the approach of getting explicit permission from vendors, that is fine. If they are implementing wrappers that download such software on demand like some other distributions, that is a clumsy but workable solution but please don't ask any other distribution to outright ignore licensing restrictions because it is "convenient". That is clearly unethical if not illegal. There are plenty of things that superficially seem irrelevant but in reality aren't. Security and licensing matters affect users all the time whether they realize it or not.
