Linux Mint downloads (briefly) compromised
Linux Mint downloads (briefly) compromised
Posted Feb 22, 2016 17:15 UTC (Mon) by glaubitz (subscriber, #96452)In reply to: Linux Mint downloads (briefly) compromised by welinder
Parent article: Linux Mint downloads (briefly) compromised
One of the main reasons for being popular is the fact that they do not care about licensing issues. They ship their ISO files with pre-installed Adobe Flash, Oracle Java packages as well as multimedia codecs (which people want) which violate intellectual copyrights and patents. Unless the maintainers of a distribution want to violate copyright laws intentionally and make themselves attractive targets for lawyers, there is nothing they can do to alleviate that. Debian and other aren't not shipping those packages because they want to make life hard for their users, it's because they cannot, legally speaking.
Canonical - as a company - was able to negotiate contracts with companies like Skype or Adobe, so they can offer the software packages of these companies in their third-party repositories, but it would still be illegal to ship software like libdvdcss2 in most countries. However, there are no companies behind distributions like Arch, Gentoo or Debian and they therefore cannot negotiate such contracts.
Again, the stance of the Mint developers - namely Clement Levebfre - is simply that they don't care about such issues which is already very dubious in the first place, not even mentioning the security issues they have.
> For me, the answer is that Linux Mint protects the users against what I will be nice
and call misguided innovation on the desktop. The fads of the day.
Well, again, you're free to use anything you like. But please be aware of the fact that Linux Mint does not provide any reasonable security support and in the end it's solely up to you to make sure all the necessary security updates are actually installed. If pre-installed multimedia codecs are more important to you than a secure system, it's your decision.
