Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 13, 2016 22:56 UTC (Sat) by marcH (subscriber, #57642) [Link]
Example showing how simple and easy such a "user interface" can be:
http://www.plugincars.com/tesla-roadster-battery-life-stu...
"Standard mode in the Roadster protects the battery by only allowing charging up to 90 percent; range mode uses the whole pack. In range mode, the Roadster should be capable of 244-mile runs, but longevity will be sacrificed."
This option is missed real bad for the very many laptops docked most of their time.
Here's the next challenge: hack whatever firmware is required to implement this switch.
No doubt manufacturers are happy with planned obsolescence but consumers are guilty too since they only look at the maximum capacity and charge speed (another battery killer) and never even think about the longevity.
Maybe the growing market share of electric cars will indirectly educate consumers about longevity. Throw-away smartphones are marketable, cars less so.
http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/how_to_prolong...
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 14, 2016 3:20 UTC (Sun) by rsidd (subscriber, #2582) [Link]
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 15, 2016 11:43 UTC (Mon) by jezuch (subscriber, #52988) [Link]
Better, I think, would be for the software to lie. I.e. show "100%" when it's actually at 90%, and stop charging then. I know that we in the Free Software community like having more options where they are possible, and to use our hardware to its fullest potential, but it's an unnecessary decision forced on the user :) (SSDs already do something like that with over-provisioning of the flash array.) Well, you could offer an option to charge to "111%", if one really, really, really needs some extra battery time, but with a stern warning that it will harm the battery.
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 15, 2016 13:15 UTC (Mon) by nye (guest, #51576) [Link]
I believe Android does this by default, but at one point (possibly still the case) it didn't adjust the entire curve to compensate, which led to phones seemingly dropping several percent almost as soon as they were unplugged, with the result being the inevitable incendiary nerdrage about how UTTERLY UNACCEPTABLE this is, and how the people who make these phones are the worst developers imaginable, literally Hitler, etc.
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 16, 2016 1:01 UTC (Tue) by hitmark (guest, #34609) [Link]
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 14, 2016 4:11 UTC (Sun) by Fowl (subscriber, #65667) [Link]
A google image search for "dell power manager" will return their many, many attempts at a Windows GUI.
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 15, 2016 15:54 UTC (Mon) by rvfh (subscriber, #31018) [Link]
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 14, 2016 8:23 UTC (Sun) by njs (guest, #40338) [Link]
http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Tp_smapi#Battery_charge_con...
http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Tpacpi-bat
For some reason though there aren't any decent UIs that expose these options (that I know of).
tp_smapi UI
Posted Feb 14, 2016 14:33 UTC (Sun) by jmayer (subscriber, #595) [Link]
tp_smapi UI
Posted Feb 15, 2016 8:28 UTC (Mon) by pbonzini (subscriber, #60935) [Link]
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 16, 2016 0:43 UTC (Tue) by marcH (subscriber, #57642) [Link]
The feature is of course hidden behind some "Advanced" button and then buried among a gazillion of other fine-tuning knobs that would make any Apple fanboy laugh to tears for a couple generations. But hey it's there and I just started using it; so thanks again. Even more so considering my battery is not end-user replaceable. I wish I had known sooner.
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 14, 2016 9:00 UTC (Sun) by zdzichu (subscriber, #17118) [Link]
But there is such interface: http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Tp_smapi#Battery_charge_con...
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 15, 2016 15:55 UTC (Mon) by rvfh (subscriber, #31018) [Link]
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 15, 2016 16:19 UTC (Mon) by JanC_ (subscriber, #34940) [Link]
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 15, 2016 16:54 UTC (Mon) by marcH (subscriber, #57642) [Link]
... some manufacturers can decide that 100% = 4.2V while others more concerned about longevity can decide that 100% = 4.1V. In other words 100% is arbitrary in the first place.
From a user friendliness perspective having two modes ("longevity" vs "capacity") is more than enough. Simplicity could also increase the chances of this feature being actually implemented and distributed. How would the average, non-chemist user know the difference between capping at 83% versus 86%?
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 17, 2016 0:44 UTC (Wed) by rahvin (subscriber, #16953) [Link]
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 18, 2016 22:12 UTC (Thu) by ttonino (guest, #4073) [Link]
But 'strongly encourage'? No, have to dig up the settings.
Capacity over longevity
Posted Feb 19, 2016 2:27 UTC (Fri) by rahvin (subscriber, #16953) [Link]
Yea switching it back and forth is buried in an advanced settings menu but bringing up a popup with lots of scary language about battery life and warranty about an hour after being on mains power is pretty much right out in your face.
Copyright © 2016, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds