Re: Should Glibc API be changed?
[Posted January 27, 2016 by jake]
| From: |
| Florian Weimer <fweimer-AT-redhat.com> |
| To: |
| rms-AT-gnu.org, emacs-devel-AT-gnu.org |
| Subject: |
| Re: Should Glibc API be changed? |
| Date: |
| Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:40:03 +0100 |
| Message-ID: |
| <569E66E3.6060307@redhat.com> |
On 01/19/2016 02:52 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> I have written to the Glibc maintainers to ask them to discuss this
> with John, but I think that a proposal for such a big incompatibility
> calls for a very broad discussion before any decisions are made.
Richard,
I'm disappointed you chose a private mailing list for the discussion.
This doesn't really match how glibc development proceeds today.
I'm puzzled why you think this is a major change. It only affects Emacs
and perhaps some unpublished (and therefore likely proprietary)
applications we know nothing about.
The research in the parent thread suggests that I was mistaken and Emacs
should compile just fine after removal of the API. And as I wrote in my
initial message, this was never about removal of the ABI, so existing
Emacs binaries will keep working.
Florian