User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Read-copy-update and interrupt latency

Read-copy-update and interrupt latency

Posted Jan 15, 2004 4:54 UTC (Thu) by jzbiciak (subscriber, #5246)
Parent article: Read-copy-update and interrupt latency

Is it just me, or did anyone else read krcud as kcrud? Fitting name for a task that's meant to garbage collect, IMHO.


(Log in to post comments)

Read-copy-update and interrupt latency

Posted Jan 15, 2004 5:03 UTC (Thu) by hisdad (subscriber, #5375) [Link]

Yeah, me too.
I've long thought the kernel needed a thread like that..

Regards

Dad

Read-copy-update and interrupt latency

Posted Jan 15, 2004 5:17 UTC (Thu) by iabervon (subscriber, #722) [Link]

I wonder if anyone actually read krcud as krcud. My first thought was that sysadmins aren't going to be happy about the rcud building up in their process tables.

Read-copy-update and interrupt latency

Posted Jan 15, 2004 18:26 UTC (Thu) by freethinker (guest, #4397) [Link]

No, kcrud is the SCO version. Which explains a few things...


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds