Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
[Posted June 9, 2015 by jake]
| From: |
| Peter Eisentraut <peter_e-AT-gmx.net> |
| To: |
| Stephen Frost <sfrost-AT-snowman.net>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd-AT-commandprompt.com> |
| Subject: |
| Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely |
| Date: |
| Thu, 28 May 2015 21:50:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID: |
| <5567C5EB.3070703@gmx.net> |
| Cc: |
| pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers-AT-postgresql.org> |
| Archive‑link: | |
Article |
On 5/28/15 3:35 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> What we would need for this is an 'extensions' directory, or similar,
> and a clear definition of what the requirements are around getting into
> it are. With that, we could decide for each module currently in contrib
> if it should go into the 'extensions' directory. I'm not sure that we
> would necessairly have to remove the contrib module or any modules which
> are deemed to not be appropriate for the 'extensions' directory.
This seems reasonable to me. It's in line with the recent move from
contrib to bin. It'll just be quite a bit bigger of an undertaking.
(50 threads to discuss the merits of each module separately?) Maybe
start by picking the top 5 and sort those out.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
