|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Looking back at 2003

This is the last LWN.net Weekly Edition for 2003, so this is an appropriate time to look back at the last year and ponder what has happened. As a way of maximizing our own embarrassment, we'll start with the predictions we posted at the beginning of the year and see how we did.

We predicted:

  • Governmental use of Linux would increase. Nobody can say that we missed on that one. Legislation requiring (at a minimum) proper consideration of free software in public purchasing has been introduced, and often passed, in many countries. Nations like Brazil and South Korea have committed to increasing their use of free software. Cities like Munich and Key Largo have made big jumps into free software. All this goes to show: it's easier to make correct predictions if you stick to obvious developments.

  • There would be high-profile desktop deployments. Opinions remain mixed on whether Linux is ready for serious desktop use now, but few dispute that it is getting there. Desktop Linux provides all the functionality that many users need, and it gets better every day. Big deployments have happened in many places, perhaps topped by Sun's large Linux sale in China, which could eventually add up to millions of desktop systems.

  • We predicted a major patent challenge for Linux. A big legal challenge did come in the form of the SCO suit, but patents were not involved. The stage remains set for serious patent problems in the future, perhaps coming from Microsoft's increasing interest in its patent portfolio. But 2003 wasn't the year for that.

  • We also predicted "a watershed year" in intellectual property law driven by a number of high-profile cases. Certainly a lot has happened; the Grokster and Skylink rulings went against oppressive copyright enforcement, UCITA died a well-deserved death, and, perhaps most significantly, an attempt to impose software patents on Europe was defeated - for now. On the other hand, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to limit copyright terms in the Eldred case. All told, it was not a watershed year, however; one year later, the situation is almost the same as it was before. All of the problems we had a year ago are still there.

  • The 2.6 kernel would be released. That happened, of course, though it wasn't that far from slipping into 2004. We did say it would happen late in the year.

  • We predicted a "SourceForge crisis." Some projects have moved away from SourceForge, and the site now has a donation box out to help cover its running expenses. But certainly there has been no "crisis."

  • UnitedLinux would not save all four participants; at least one of them would exit the distribution business by the end of the year. Well, that happened, but not quite as we had envisioned. But UnitedLinux member SCO is certainly out of the distribution business, and UnitedLinux has passed into irrelevance. We also said that MandrakeSoft would find a way to pull through and become a viable company. That appears to be happening, albeit via a period in bankruptcy proceedings.

We also missed a few things. The small resurgence in acquisitions of Linux companies (Scyld, Ximian, SUSE, Sistina) was a pleasant surprise, for the people involved if nobody else. The importance and commercial success of "enterprise Linux" distributions, along with the resulting backlash, was and is an important story for 2003. The increasing level of attacks on the community's infrastructure was an ominous development. And the SCO Group's rampage took us by surprise, along with just about everybody else.

What we didn't even bother to predict was that development would continue, the code would get better, and that Linux would continue to grow. That was too obvious even for LWN. But it happened, and will continue to happen. It is still true that the free software story is just beginning.

(Tune in during next week's break, when we will publish our predictions for 2004. We're still trying to get the crystal ball booted up properly as of this writing; contrary to some rumors, the crystal ball has not been taken down by a security compromise. Trust us).


to post comments

SF.net

Posted Dec 30, 2003 10:06 UTC (Tue) by cine (guest, #5597) [Link]

Not having anonymous CVS access for 6 month does not count as a crisis?


Copyright © 2003, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds