|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Thanks

Thanks

Posted Nov 24, 2014 20:18 UTC (Mon) by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
In reply to: Thanks by mgb
Parent article: Today's Debian technical committee resignation: Ian Jackson

It won't. Socket-activated processes don't get killed because they're idle. systemd ignores the socket while the process is running, so how could it know?

to post comments

Thanks

Posted Nov 24, 2014 20:48 UTC (Mon) by mgb (guest, #3226) [Link]

> Socket-activated processes don't get killed because they're idle.

The subthread to which you are responding is concerned with zuki's suggestion http://lwn.net/Articles/622790/ that sshd should exit on idle.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds