|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Thanks

Thanks

Posted Nov 22, 2014 21:46 UTC (Sat) by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
In reply to: Thanks by mgb
Parent article: Today's Debian technical committee resignation: Ian Jackson

Dependency resolution in an init system doesn't need anything remotely this elaborate. We don't even need alternates (what for?).


to post comments

Thanks

Posted Nov 22, 2014 22:08 UTC (Sat) by mgb (guest, #3226) [Link]

> Dependency resolution in an init system doesn't need anything remotely this elaborate.

Rete is not elaborate. It is a clean elegant modular algorithm.

> We don't even need alternates (what for?).

Alternate networks. Sometimes alternate data stores. Alternate entropy sources - you want sshd ASAP but maybe not until you have some entropy. "If I can't get any entropy bring up sshd only on the private LAN and if that doesn't work fall back to telnetd on the private LAN."

As the "new" init systems try to invade serious servers they will keep on running into problems and adding more keywords and reliving the 70's until they eventually relearn the lessons of the early 80's.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds