|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

The Grumpy Editor's guide to surviving the systemd debate

The Grumpy Editor's guide to surviving the systemd debate

Posted Nov 14, 2014 19:10 UTC (Fri) by dlang (guest, #313)
In reply to: The Grumpy Editor's guide to surviving the systemd debate by mgb
Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's guide to surviving the systemd debate

the problem is in evaluating intent

is making Gnome depend on systemd done to force systemd to be installed? because the person doing it didn't realize they did it? or because it's the only way to get something done that they think is more important than running on systems without systemd?

patches and text communications are a horrible way to try and figure out what the intent of the person was, especially if there is any suspicion that they are not being open about their intent


to post comments

The Grumpy Editor's guide to surviving the systemd debate

Posted Nov 28, 2014 6:47 UTC (Fri) by blujay (guest, #39961) [Link]

Isn't the end result more important than someone's intentions?


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds