The security state of KVM
The security state of KVM
Posted Nov 13, 2014 3:03 UTC (Thu) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)Parent article: The security state of KVM
Is it possible for the userspace component to inform the kernel of the functionality it will take responsibility for emulating, leaving a backward compatible kernel and a bunch of codepaths that the kernel will refuse to execute if userspace knows what it's doing?
The LWN site is currently under high scraper load, so comment display has been suppressed for anonymous users. If you are a human, you may read the comments by clicking the button below:
Note: you can avoid this step in the future by logging into your LWN account.