|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

On the sickness of our community

On the sickness of our community

Posted Oct 10, 2014 5:04 UTC (Fri) by alankila (guest, #47141)
In reply to: On the sickness of our community by RobSeace
Parent article: On the sickness of our community

It is certainly abuse but I perceive no threat in it. Without threat aspect, Linus's rants tend to be just colorful and amusing. This is all, of course, PR nightmare stuff -- if you want to make the case that Linus is a deranged psychopath, then just collect half dozen of his rants in one post and insinuate some ugly facts about his person, and call it a day.

Linus seems to have said that he believes his use of language is justified and correct, and any problems are at audience's end. This is a point that one can debate. I can not see any general solution to problems of miscommunication -- sometimes the speaker was unclear, sometimes the receiver imposed meaning that was not correct.

This society seems to favor the idea that speaker must always be very careful and if words are misunderstood, it is the speaker's responsibility. It is probably appropriate in mass media situation where there is one speaker and millions of receivers, and such messages must be crafted with care. On the other hand, human social behavior in a mailing list -- while technically viewable to public -- is hardly the sort of public broadcast where utmost care is required.


to post comments

On the sickness of our community

Posted Oct 10, 2014 5:07 UTC (Fri) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]

Generally true but if you are a leader with a community or generally a well known personality, you got to essentially treat your posts as mass media communication. yes, this is a significant burden but that is part of the role you are playing.

On the sickness of our community

Posted Oct 10, 2014 11:12 UTC (Fri) by RobSeace (subscriber, #4435) [Link]

> It is certainly abuse

But, of whom? An anonymous person? I still maintain it's just abuse of a personification of bad code... The target of the attack isn't a real person, but the stupid coding design... I'm not sure I'm worried about code being verbally abused... Lord knows I've cursed out my fair share over the decades!

I see what he said there to be roughly the same as saying, "Who was the moron who thought gets() was a great function to include in the standard library?? I hope whoever they are, they get eaten by wolves!"... It's not really attacking any real person; it's inventing an imaginary person which personifies the bad code in question and attacking that, and doing so in an obviously hyperbolic and non-serious manner...

On the sickness of our community

Posted Oct 16, 2014 13:35 UTC (Thu) by ksandstr (guest, #60862) [Link]

Sir, if you believe that a deranged psychopath can be recognized from a handful of cherry-picked mailing-list postings, then I've got a nice bridge to sell to you.

Sheesh. Would a spot of medium-awareness inflame your haemorrhoids?


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds