On the sickness of our community

Posted Oct 9, 2014 20:07 UTC (Thu) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198)
In reply to: On the sickness of our community by ssmith32
Parent article: On the sickness of our community

It seems to me more like using humor to diffuse and make light of the situation, the systemd folks got called something silly by an influential CEO so they had t-shirts printed to make a joke of it, that doesn't sound like hard feelings and vitriol to me.

While there it too much acceptance of bullying instead of civil behavior in our community I don't think we should allow our fight against it to destroy our sense of humor.

to post comments

On the sickness of our community

Posted Oct 10, 2014 9:50 UTC (Fri) by airlied (subscriber, #9104) [Link] (1 responses)

The t-shirt thing is called passive-aggressive trolling.

On the sickness of our community

Posted Oct 10, 2014 15:01 UTC (Fri) by wookey (guest, #5501) [Link]

Indeed. In the early days of Ubuntu, a few debian developers took to wearing 'FCUK Ubuntu' T-shirts (in homage to a certain fashion brand AD of the time). That's, erm, 'not very nice'.

Taunting gone wrong

Posted Oct 11, 2014 9:55 UTC (Sat) by simosx (guest, #24338) [Link] (2 responses)

> While there it too much acceptance of bullying instead of civil behavior in our community I don't think we should allow our fight against it to destroy our sense of humor.

I think that describes the whole misconception. Just like some people who claim freedom of speech for their personal attacks.

Being _funny_ at the expense of others is not nice. If someone has a real sense of humor, they can safely work on any self-deprecating funny material.

Apparently, the _death threat_ against Lennart Poettering was a comment on IRC about _hiring a hitman_ because that person was annoyed about something. It is quite possible that that person was "being funny".
Just like it is _funny_ when some people shout "I'll kill you" when they are being cut off on the road while driving. Obviously, then do not really mean to kill anyone. However, it's up to interpretation whether those were just venting their frustration or it was an actual death threat.

With some social intelligence, it's possible to feel when someone is overstepping the lines. For those who have trouble realizing those boundaries, they can check-in at a main airport while singing "bomb bomb bomb" over a tune of their choice.

Taunting gone wrong

Posted Oct 11, 2014 12:58 UTC (Sat) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]

>Apparently, the _death threat_ against Lennart Poettering was a comment on IRC about _hiring a hitman_

As others have pointed out before there was a kickstarter style campaign as well that got taken down later.

Taunting gone wrong

Posted Oct 11, 2014 15:50 UTC (Sat) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198) [Link]

> people who claim freedom of speech for their personal attacks

The last refuge of an argument that has totally failed, that it's not technically illegal to say ... 8-)

> Being _funny_ at the expense of others is not nice

That depends on the context, among friends insult-humor is common, the difference with our communities is that this kind of in-group commentary often happens on public mailing lists and not in private as it would in-person. That is some of the heart of this issue, at least where Linus is concerned, the mailing lists are both a public work space for employees at many companies, who prefer civil business-like communication, and the personal living room of the old-timers who act like vikings on occasion.

> With some social intelligence, it's possible to feel when someone is overstepping the lines. For those who have trouble realizing those boundaries, they can check-in at a main airport while singing "bomb bomb bomb" over a tune of their choice.

LOL