|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

wireshark: yet another pile of dissector flaws

wireshark: yet another pile of dissector flaws

Posted Oct 6, 2014 22:53 UTC (Mon) by bronson (guest, #4806)
In reply to: wireshark: yet another pile of dissector flaws by malor
Parent article: wireshark: yet another pile of dissector flaws

Sorry, missed this.

> Actually, I'd say the burden of proof is on you, since I never mentioned anything about Stuxnet scale. What I said is that targeted attacks definitely get used. Can you prove otherwise?

Sure. As far as I know, targeted attacks have not successfully been used against Wireshark yet. You're the one saying it's such a big problem so maybe post some evidence demonstrating why?

As pizza said, it would be really REALLY difficult to target Wireshark. Not impossible, just requiring an unbelievable amount of preparation. I shortened that concept to to "Stuxnet-scale" but you can insert whatever APT name you want.

Yes, I agree, it's a problem. However, everything is a trade-off, and this is how the devs have chosen to proceed. If Wireshark scares you so deeply, don't worry: it's not installed by default.


to post comments


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds