wireshark: yet another pile of dissector flaws

Posted Oct 6, 2014 13:36 UTC (Mon) by Fowl (subscriber, #65667)
In reply to: wireshark: yet another pile of dissector flaws by dlang
Parent article: wireshark: yet another pile of dissector flaws

I've always thought of packet sniffers as a debugging type tool, trying to make sense of *anything* and making note of/picking apart any flaws you find.

Apparently not.

yada yada yada "why are they written in C anyway" blah blah