Distributions
LuneOS tries to keep webOS alive
Even the most dedicated watchers of mobile operating systems may have been surprised recently when a distribution called "LuneOS" announced its first release (code-named "Affogato"). LuneOS, it turns out, is a version of webOS, a mobile operating system originally created by Palm. WebOS has had a bit of a troubled history, but it still has a dedicated following of users and developers. LuneOS is another attempt to turn webOS into a useful system for those users. The effort is a noble one, but the LuneOS developers have a lot of ground to cover yet.
After its initial fall when Palm ran into financial trouble, webOS seemed destined for great things after HP announced that it would be open-sourcing the system and using it as the core of its mobile strategy. The euphoria did not last long, however; HP canceled most of its mobile initiatives before they really even got started. The webOS system was eventually sold to LG, which has since incorporated webOS into its "Smart TV" product line.
LG also took over the management of the Open webOS project, which is meant to continue the development of webOS as an open-source project. The software is still clearly being developed, but it seems like a stretch to describe Open webOS as a truly successful project at this point. Activity is low, the last weblog posting was in March, and there have been no releases usable by the community. A recent GigaOM article described the webOS acquisition as a "failed experiment," attributing the failure to internal corporate power struggles. Also, importantly, LG has abandoned the "LunaSysMgr" user interface, replacing it with a proprietary interface module on its TVs. So there really is not much for an outside development community to work with.
The webOS Ports project is working to rectify this situation by creating a webOS distribution that is installable on real-world devices. Its developers have taken the webOS code and based it on the Android kernel and some low-level Android user-space components; the libhybris library is used to do impedance matching between Android components (that expect the "bionic" C library) and glibc. Rather than maintain LunaSysMgr on their own, project members decided to write a new user interface (called "Luna Next") from scratch. This module reuses some LunaSysMgr code, but is based on Qt and WebKit. The project has also replaced the on-screen keyboard (with Maliit) and a number of other components.
The result is a system that retains a number of webOS concepts but is increasingly distant from webOS itself. The goal of this work is described in the release announcement:
The current "Affogato" release is available for four devices: the HP TouchPad, the Nexus 4 phone, the Nexus 7 Tablet, and the Galaxy Nexus phone. The latter two devices will not be supported going forward; development effort will focus on the TouchPad and the Nexus 4. As it happens, your editor has a sacrificial Nexus 4 sitting around just waiting for a chance to run an experimental new operating system. So giving LuneOS Affogato a try seemed like the obvious thing to do.
The LuneOS experience
A prospective LuneOS user might be forgiven for thinking that they are
getting off to a rocky start. The installation
instructions start with a list of seven rules that one must agree
to before installing the system; they include things like which URLs may be
publicly posted and a requirement to "fastidiously follow
" the
project's IRC channel. Your editor, never a big IRC fan, stands in
violation; a visit from the webOS Ports Police is nervously anticipated.
As of this writing, the URL on that page for the actual installation image is incorrect. Your editor dug around and finally ended up with the webos-ports-package-mako.zip image (dated September 1) from this directory (hopefully posting that URL is not a violation of rule #6). At that point, assuming the device is already unlocked and has the ClockworkMod Recovery image on it, installing LuneOS is a matter of a single adb sideload command followed by a reboot.
When the system boots, it starts by presenting an end-user license agreement stating that LuneOS can only be used for non-commercial purposes. That restriction is blamed on the existence of binary driver blobs (taken from Android) in the system itself. One must agree before anything else can be done. The problem with "non-commercial" licenses, of course, is that "non-commercial" is poorly defined. Whether testing the device for an LWN article qualifies will, one might imagine, have to be worked out in that conversation with the aforementioned webOS Ports Police.
The feel of the system resembles that of past webOS devices, unsurprisingly. There is a home screen with a dock at the bottom for a few applications including a launcher for all the rest. There is a single button that, when tapped, zooms back to a scrollable list of all running applications, allowing quick switching between them. The set of available applications includes a web browser, an email client, a PDF viewer, a fairly extensive terminal emulator, a calendar, a calculator, and not a whole lot more. There is a tool for software management, but no indication of a functioning repository for add-on applications.
The overall presentation is attractive and, in many ways, pleasant to use. It must be said, though, that the lack of a "back" button makes itself felt frequently; it often feels like applications lead the user into dead-end screens that cannot be escaped from. What's worse, though, is that things really just do not work very well. Response is often sluggish and applications will become unresponsive for lengthy periods of time. WiFi networking is supposed to work in this release, but it never was able to see any of the (many) access points visible from LWN's testing laboratory. In general, it does not feel like a system that one would want to use even for serious testing, much less as an actual phone.
In all fairness, the LuneOS developers never claimed to have a production-ready system. They are, as is mentioned a couple of times in the Affogato announcement, a small group trying to take on a large task. It is unsurprising that this task is taking a long time to come to fruition. Indeed, unless it can bring in some more developers, the webOS Ports community may have a hard time ever getting LuneOS to a point where it might be truly useful for anybody other than the most committed webOS enthusiasts.
It would be a good thing if they did succeed. As nice as Android is, it is in need of strong competition from at least one open-source alternative. LuneOS, a community-developed distribution based on a known-to-be-popular system, could possibly be such an alternative if it could build up some momentum. That looks like a long shot, though; the barriers to entry in this area are high and getting higher and it is not at all clear that a small, unfunded project like LuneOS can ever get much traction. But, then, that's what was once said about operating system kernels, so one never knows.
Brief items
Distribution quotes of the week
The first LuneOS release
LuneOS is the new name for the mobile system once known as webOS; the first release is available for brave testers now. "The main focus of LuneOS is to provide an operating system which is driven by the community and continues what we love(d) about webOS. We’re not trying to reach feature comparison with Android or iOS but rather building a system to satisfy basic needs in the mobile environment." The Nexus 4 and HP TouchPad appear to be the best devices for those wanting to try LuneOS out on real hardware.
Clarification: LuneOS is not really a direct successor to webOS; it, instead, can be thought of as a sort of fork of the Open webOS project (managed by LG) focused on porting the system to other devices.
Distribution News
Debian GNU/Linux
DebConf 14 closes in Portland and DebConf 15 dates announced
The Debian Project wraps up DebConf 14, recently held in Portland, Oregon. "With over 300 people attending from all over the world, 80 hours of talks in over 100 events, the conference has been hailed as a success by head local organiser Steve Langasek." DebConf 15 will be held August 15-22, 2015, in Heidelberg, Germany.
DebConf 14 videos
DebConf 14 took place August 23-31 in Portland, Oregon. Videos of the talks are available in WebM format.Results of the Bootstrap/Crossbuild Sprint
Six Debian developers recently met for the Bootstrap/Crossbuild Sprint. This report covers problems with early bootstrapping, partial archives for different ISAs, cross compilers in main, cross compile support in source packages, bootstrap and crossbuild quality assurance, and several other topics.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4 Extended Update Support 6-Month Notice
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4 Extended Update Support will be retired as of February 28, 2015.
Ubuntu family
Ubuntu 14.10 (Utopic Unicorn) beta-1 released
Several Ubuntu flavors have released a beta version of 14.10 (Utopic Unicorn). Beta images are available for Kubuntu, Lubuntu, Ubuntu GNOME, UbuntuKylin, Xubuntu and Ubuntu Cloud.
Newsletters and articles of interest
Distribution newsletters
- DistroWatch Weekly, Issue 574 (September 1)
- Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter, Issue 381 (August 31)
Poettering: Revisiting how we put together Linux systems
Lennart Poettering has posted a lengthy writeup of a plan put together by the "systemd cabal" (his words) to rework Linux software distribution. It is based heavily on namespaces and Btrfs snapshots. "Now, with the name-spacing concepts we introduced above, we can actually relatively freely mix and match apps and OSes, or develop against specific frameworks in specific versions on any operating system. It doesn't matter if you booted your ArchLinux instance, or your Fedora one, you can execute both LibreOffice and Firefox just fine, because at execution time they get matched up with the right runtime, and all of them are available from all the operating systems you installed. You get the precise runtime that the upstream vendor of Firefox/LibreOffice did their testing with. It doesn't matter anymore which distribution you run, and which distribution the vendor prefers."
Peach OSI Is Fresh and Juicy (LinuxInsider)
LinuxInsider has a review of Peach OSI, a new distribution that uses the Xfce desktop. "Peach OSI runs on Linux kernel 3.13.0-32 generic and the Xorg version 1.15.1 windowing system released on April 16. The 64-bit version can handle up to 126 GB of RAM, while the 32-bit version can run on 512 MB of memory or less. I ran it on a very old bare-bones laptop as well as on a supercharged desktop. Sure, Peach sputtered a tiny bit on the low-end rig -- but it loaded and ran. I can not say that about any other Linux installation I have tried in that sparse a setting, except for Puppy Linux."
Page editor: Rebecca Sobol
Next page:
Development>>
