| From: |
| Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
| To: |
| x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> |
| Subject: |
| [PATCH 0/2] Syscall auditing lite |
| Date: |
| Fri, 30 May 2014 14:58:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID: |
| <cover.1401486790.git.luto@amacapital.net> |
| Cc: |
| Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
| Archive‑link: | |
Article |
I've made no secret of the fact that I dislike syscall auditing. As far
as I can tell, the main technical (i.e. not compliance-related) use of
syscall auditing is to supply some useful context information to go
along with events like AVC denials.
CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL is serious overkill to do this. kernel/auditsc.c is
~2500 lines of terror.
This patchset accomplishes the same goal, more usefully, with no
overhead at all, in under 70 lines of code. It tries to coexist cleanly
with CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL.
This is only implemented for x86. Other architectures can add support
fairly easily, I think.
Andy Lutomirski (2):
x86,syscall: Add syscall_in_syscall to test whether we're in a syscall
audit: Syscall auditing lite
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
init/Kconfig | 3 +++
kernel/audit.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/