User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE

From:  Ingo Molnar <mingo-AT-kernel.org>
To:  Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-AT-efficios.com>
Subject:  Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Date:  Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:27:38 +0100
Message-ID:  <20140211072738.GA24232@gmail.com>
Cc:  Steven Rostedt <rostedt-AT-goodmis.org>, linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo-AT-redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx-AT-linutronix.de>, Rusty Russell <rusty-AT-rustcorp.com.au>, David Howells <dhowells-AT-redhat.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh-AT-linuxfoundation.org>
Archive-link:  Article


* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:

> Users have reported being unable to trace non-signed modules loaded 
> within a kernel supporting module signature.

External modules should strive to get out of the 'crap' and
'felony law breaker' categories and we should not make it
easier for them to linger in a broken state.

Nacked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Thanks,

	Ingo


(Log in to post comments)


Copyright © 2014, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds