User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

A call for votes in the Debian init system discussion

A call for votes in the Debian init system discussion

Posted Jan 29, 2014 17:43 UTC (Wed) by paulj (subscriber, #341)
In reply to: A call for votes in the Debian init system discussion by raven667
Parent article: A call for votes in the Debian init system discussion

Inetd processes could persist. There generally wasn't a convention for also handing over listen sockets, so this was only useful on connectionless sockets / UDP. However, had there been a demand, handing over the listen socket could have been implemented easily, just as systemd does.

So, given the benefits, it's just weird that there wasn't more take-up of this. I agree socket activation is a good thing, and it'll be nice if systemd makes it fashionable again. I'm just curious why it didn't stay fashionable the last time around?


(Log in to post comments)

A call for votes in the Debian init system discussion

Posted Jan 29, 2014 17:52 UTC (Wed) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198) [Link]

My opinion is that as UNIX became more popular with hardware vendors there was a greater push for standardization and portability, and enterprise support, which caused many services to get frozen in time with no new features added and no compatibility breaks allowed. Stagnation which has persisted until recently.


Copyright © 2018, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds