Re: Releases in 3 months

On Montag, 8. Juli 2013 20:09:47 CEST, laurent Montel wrote:

> Yes I finished it 2 days ago, but started 2 months ago.
> So it was bug fixing, I didn’t create new feature 2 days ago.
>
> And I had 6 months to develop it, so think when there is 3 months to do it.

Hein?

And if it took you 10 years or so, ultimately this only gets you more fine grained release cycles,
ie. you develop it in 7months, move it to master and then have to wait only 2 months until it gets
released instead of 5.

If you dump a half broken todo list into master, hoping you'll be able to "fix" it before the next
release "you're holding it wrongly" in the first place, see the message about "ppl. using master on
a regular base".


The feature btw. still has bugs. I'm dead sure about that.
That's not the definition of the feature freeze.

The question is: had you added a usable feature before the freeze and 2 days ago fixed a nullptr
resolution or similar (bugfix) or was the feature more or less unusable until to days ago (then you
technically broke the feature freeze - don't let Albert know in case ;-)


Cheers,
Thomas