Philosophy and "for" loops — more from Go and Rust
Philosophy and "for" loops — more from Go and Rust
Posted Jul 9, 2013 2:34 UTC (Tue) by rbetts@gweep.net (guest, #21779)In reply to: Philosophy and "for" loops — more from Go and Rust by nigeltao
Parent article: Philosophy and "for" loops — more from Go and Rust
I often hope that go will someday publish a range protocol and make anything that implements "ranger" (can't resist) range-iterable. I have no basis for understanding where that falls on the feasibility scale, though.
