|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Philosophy and "for" loops — more from Go and Rust

Philosophy and "for" loops — more from Go and Rust

Posted Jul 9, 2013 2:34 UTC (Tue) by rbetts@gweep.net (guest, #21779)
In reply to: Philosophy and "for" loops — more from Go and Rust by nigeltao
Parent article: Philosophy and "for" loops — more from Go and Rust

I often hope that go will someday publish a range protocol and make anything that implements "ranger" (can't resist) range-iterable. I have no basis for understanding where that falls on the feasibility scale, though.


to post comments

Philosophy and "for" loops — more from Go and Rust

Posted Oct 3, 2013 17:11 UTC (Thu) by mcortese (guest, #52099) [Link]

I agree. It sounds logical, elegant, and consistent with the rest of Go philosophy.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds