|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

IRS Puts Open Source Projects Under Microscope, Spawns Nonprofit Black Hole (Wired)

IRS Puts Open Source Projects Under Microscope, Spawns Nonprofit Black Hole (Wired)

Posted Jun 28, 2013 5:50 UTC (Fri) by Russ.Dill@gmail.com (guest, #52805)
In reply to: IRS Puts Open Source Projects Under Microscope, Spawns Nonprofit Black Hole (Wired) by JoeBuck
Parent article: IRS Puts Open Source Projects Under Microscope, Spawns Nonprofit Black Hole (Wired)

Maybe it should work that way. If you are releasing the software under an open license, then the work is being done for a public good. For instance, there are many organizations that maintain public hiking trails and have non-profit status. If a lodge that was near a public land trail donated to one of these organizations to have this trail revitalized, would that be an analogous situation?


to post comments

IRS Puts Open Source Projects Under Microscope, Spawns Nonprofit Black Hole (Wired)

Posted Jul 1, 2013 11:40 UTC (Mon) by endecotp (guest, #36428) [Link] (1 responses)

> there are many organizations that maintain public hiking
> trails and have non-profit status. If a lodge that was
> near a public land trail donated to one of these organizations
> to have this trail revitalized, would that be an analogous
> situation?

Here in the UK, there are rules about the benefit that a
company is allowed to get in return for a donation. If the
benefit is more than (typically) 5% of the value of the
payment, then it is not considered a donation by the tax
authorities; rather, it's a payment for good & services.

But actually, your example is off-target as companies can
count both donations and payments for services as business
expenses. The important issue arises when it's not a company
(the hiking lodge in your example) but an individual who is
making the donation. If I, as an individual hiker, make
a payment to a trail maintenance organisation, then should
that be tax exempt? We might all agree that maintaining
hiking trails is a "public good" and deserves charitable
status, but there are difficult edge cases especially where
the thing being maintained is of benefit primarily to more
wealthy individuals. A good example here is private schools,
most of which still controversially enjoy charitable status.
In comparison to, for example, a charity that supplies
mosquito nets to Africa, it's far from clear to me that a
body that improves the software that I use in my for-profit
business should be charitable.

IRS Puts Open Source Projects Under Microscope, Spawns Nonprofit Black Hole (Wired)

Posted Jul 3, 2013 2:17 UTC (Wed) by shmget (guest, #58347) [Link]

"In comparison to, for example, a charity that supplies
mosquito nets to Africa, it's far from clear to me that a
body that improves the software that I use in my for-profit
business should be charitable."

Even if you for-profit business is a Hotel in Africa that benefit from donated mosquito net ?

I would think that a 'charity providing mosquito net' _exclusively_ to africa is just as dubious as a charity financing a private school... in both case it restrict the _public_ to a sub-grup selected on a criteria that is orthogonal to the approved goal of the charity.
(the former would be to improve health condition of the public, the second - presumably - to educate the public... both being approved charity purposed to qualify for tax-exemption).


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds