Delay may be okay; forbidding is not [LWN.net]

Delay may be okay; forbidding is not

Posted Jun 27, 2013 21:22 UTC (Thu) by josh (subscriber, #17465)
In reply to: Delay may be okay; forbidding is not by david.a.wheeler
Parent article: IRS Puts Open Source Projects Under Microscope, Spawns Nonprofit Black Hole (Wired)

Agreed.

On the other hand, sufficiently advanced bureaucracy is indistinguishable from malice. I can pretty easily imagine such bureaucracy leading to multi-year delays that aren't actually associated with a denial.

to post comments

Advanced bureaucracy

Posted Jun 28, 2013 7:04 UTC (Fri) by oldtomas (guest, #72579) [Link] (5 responses)

"sufficiently advanced bureaucracy is indistinguishable from malice"

I've never seen such an elegant generalization of Clarke's Third Law. You made my day!

Definitely QOTD worthy.

Advanced bureaucracy

Posted Jun 28, 2013 9:27 UTC (Fri) by k3ninho (subscriber, #50375) [Link] (4 responses)

I prefer the ramp up via Hanlon's Razor "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" which spawns "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice", known in some places as Grey's Law. The interchangeability of bureaucracy and incompetence is a given.

Advanced bureaucracy

Posted Jun 28, 2013 12:11 UTC (Fri) by micka (subscriber, #38720) [Link] (1 responses)

> The interchangeability of bureaucracy and incompetence is a given.

Just add "I think..." before any sentence that express a mere point of view, please.
It's so much better to not have definitive sentences if you don't have the intention to give arguments.

Advanced bureaucracy

Posted Jun 28, 2013 16:15 UTC (Fri) by k3ninho (subscriber, #50375) [Link]

>> The interchangeability of bureaucracy and incompetence is a given.
> I think you should just add "I think..." before any sentence that express a mere point of view, please.
> I think it's so much better to not have definitive sentences if you don't have the intention to give arguments.

TITIFTFY (There, I think I've fixed this for you). Further, from where I stand the sense of my words is prefaced by 'I prefer...' at the top and ultimately sidelined as non-argumentative by the jokey context for this branch of the discussion. I think that you might have overlooked this - no worries.

K3n.

Advanced bureaucracy

Posted Jun 28, 2013 15:13 UTC (Fri) by tjc (guest, #137) [Link]

> The interchangeability of bureaucracy and incompetence is a given.

It certainly seems so!

Advanced bureaucracy

Posted Jun 30, 2013 7:50 UTC (Sun) by drag (guest, #31333) [Link]

There is a such thing as 'incompetent malice'.

Unfortunately as you get older you find that incompetence and malice are not mutually exclusive concepts. In fact, they go together more often then not.