User: Password:
Subscribe / Log in / New account



Posted Jun 10, 2013 8:59 UTC (Mon) by oldtomas (guest, #72579)
In reply to: The Wayland Situation: Facts About X vs. Wayland (Phoronix) by daniels
Parent article: The Wayland Situation: Facts About X vs. Wayland (Phoronix)

Are you serious? My sarcasm-o-meter is giving contradictory readings...

(Log in to post comments)


Posted Jun 18, 2013 11:27 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

He's being patronizing and sarcastic because, well, as far as I can tell because I've knocked a hole in his argument and he has no constructive response he can give. Depressing.

It would be less depressing if I hadn't been banging on about the same subject in virtually every thread on the same subject here for *years* and if Daniel hadn't been reading those threads as well and hadn't completely ignored them or been just as patronizing in all of those.

I wouldn't make such a fuss, except, again, this workflow is the one in which I have earned every penny I have ever earned. And it's not at all a subtle or unlikely workflow, unlike the workflow of someone making their living from a remote instance of fucking xeyes.

(Why yes, Daniel *has* just made me very angry. Way to piss off your users and make your users suspect that the Wayland developers don't give a damn about how their actual *users* are using the system they're trying to replace, mate. Well done. Very well done. Do I have any confidence in Wayland at all? Not after *that* comment.)

Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds