A proposal for an always-releasable Debian [LWN.net]

A proposal for an always-releasable Debian

Posted May 11, 2013 14:39 UTC (Sat) by robert_s (subscriber, #42402)
In reply to: A proposal for an always-releasable Debian by sstsalazar
Parent article: A proposal for an always-releasable Debian

> A platform like lauchpad/ppa, which would allow one to smoothly add repositories with newer packages

Like http://backports.debian.org/ ?

to post comments

A proposal for an always-releasable Debian

Posted May 12, 2013 1:48 UTC (Sun) by dlang (guest, #313) [Link] (6 responses)

close, the problem is that with backports you either enable ALL backports, or you load and update each package manually

With PPA, each package is it's own repository, so you enable the package you want and don't think about it again.

A proposal for an always-releasable Debian

Posted May 16, 2013 3:55 UTC (Thu) by jmorris42 (guest, #2203) [Link] (5 responses)

Not seeing the difference. Once you take a backport it will continue to update that package automatically. How is that different from the extra step of installing an entirely new repo that automatically updates.

A proposal for an always-releasable Debian

Posted May 16, 2013 5:52 UTC (Thu) by dlang (guest, #313) [Link] (4 responses)

It's very possible that I don't know the correct way to take a backport.

the information at http://backports.debian.org seems to say that the way to do this is to add backports to your sources.list file, which will pull in every package in backports (which is almost as bad as moving to testing)

The only other way I've installed a package from testing or backports was to go to packages.debian.org, search for the package, and then download and install the .deb manually, which doesn't get updated after that.

What do I not know?

A proposal for an always-releasable Debian

Posted May 16, 2013 7:02 UTC (Thu) by rhertzog (subscriber, #4671) [Link] (3 responses)

From http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ :

----
All backports are deactivated by default (i.e. the packages are pinned to 100 by using ButAutomaticUpgrades: yes in the Release files. If you want to install something from backports run:

apt-get -t squeeze-backports install "package"
----

So you're wrong.

A proposal for an always-releasable Debian

Posted May 16, 2013 9:57 UTC (Thu) by dlang (guest, #313) [Link] (2 responses)

Thanks for the correction and additional info.

I didn't know that apt/deb even had the ability to have a repo with packages in it that are newer than what you have installed without auto-upgrading to them. the only place I had run across that was in source distros like Gentoo.

It's always good to learn new things.

A proposal for an always-releasable Debian

Posted May 19, 2013 21:04 UTC (Sun) by jospoortvliet (guest, #33164) [Link]

note that this is also how openSUSE handles stuff since years. Go to software.opensuse.org/packages and the software you find will (with One-click-install) enable a repo. The average openSUSE user has like 10 repos or more with extra or newer software. Heck, one of these obs repos makes openSUSE a rolling-release distro: tumbleweed. Yep, all that because we got zypper and OBS which, frankly, kick the ass of any other distro's infrastructure.

A proposal for an always-releasable Debian

Posted May 19, 2013 21:35 UTC (Sun) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]

umm. This is very much possible in a number of RPM based distros including Fedora, openSUSE etc.