User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Quotes of the week

Quotes of the week

Posted Mar 6, 2013 9:23 UTC (Wed) by ortalo (subscriber, #4654)
In reply to: Quotes of the week by dlang
Parent article: Quotes of the week

True. However, how does that differentiate from governemental implication with respect to public investment in security?

Insurances try to minimize the risk, but they accepted to insure that risk in the first place. So that's just a moral question on where you spend the money (less victims or more indemnification...) but the game is cheated.
Governments do not have the choice to select the risks they deal with. They have to take into account real risks as is and deal with them. So, I am more inclined to consider that an insurance-oriented view may not be the best way of considering the problem.

However the funding problem issue (whether based on real money or motivation or volunteer time) is pretty similar. Collective action is needed.


(Log in to post comments)

Quotes of the week

Posted Mar 7, 2013 2:54 UTC (Thu) by dlang (subscriber, #313) [Link]

actually, governments, just like private companies, can ignore or falsely evaluate risks and what they need to do to deal with them.

And they do on a regular basis.

They either accept the loss, fix the problem, or try to make it someone else's problem in the future (pretending that it never happened is one form of accepting the loss, and both governments and private companies do this)


Copyright © 2018, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds