User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Distribution quotes of the week

Distribution quotes of the week

Posted Dec 17, 2012 16:00 UTC (Mon) by wookey (subscriber, #5501)
Parent article: Distribution quotes of the week

Maybe I should start ranting about how those terrible RedHat/Fedora people are fragmenting the ecosystem by not adopting multiarch. That would clearly be constructive. :-)

Although I do worry that as things currently stand it looks like we are heading for another Debian/Fedora (and thus derivatives) split along this axis too, which won't make life any easier for 3rd-parties. I am hopeful that other distros will come to appreciate the cleanness of the multiarch mechanism for mixed-ABI libraries and binaries, but I guess we won't know for a few years yet how ubiquitous it will become.

Personally, the more I use it the more impressed I become. It's so nice being able to _remove_ big chunks of complexity in packages and packaging that used to work around its absence.


(Log in to post comments)

Distribution quotes of the week

Posted Dec 17, 2012 21:22 UTC (Mon) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link]

As a Fedora packager, I would wholeheartedly +1 a move from the current "biarch" setup to Debian's multiarch setup. I believe the ARM architecture is doing something similar to Debian here.

As for the Debian/Fedora split, there already was one since 64bit uses /usr/lib64 on Fedora and /usr/lib on Debian. So it's that they ever agreed 100% before anyways. (I do prefer /usr/lib64 and /usr/lib split for 64bit over Debian's previous "native == /usr/lib" setup which makes installing 32bit on a 64bit flavor easy, but multiarch is a better overall solution).


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds