When someone asks for help with proprietary program X its common to suggest open source implementation Y. Does that make us bad people trying to subvert the proprietary software movement, or does it just reflect the fact that we understand and have experience with the open-source version. Clearly MSFT has tested their process with a particular set of windows tools, and it evidently almost worked.
The only real mistakes in their process are
a) The initial error when the process was checked to see if it was a win32 binary
b) signing the key with a generic MSFT key that they don't want you to actually use.
Complaining about Cabinet files and Silverlight seems a bit off to me.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds