21st-century Csound

Posted Nov 8, 2012 14:58 UTC (Thu) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
In reply to: 21st-century Csound by fsateler
Parent article: 21st-century Csound

That doesn't make sense. If it only allows non-commercial use, it isn't the MIT license as we normally denote it.

to post comments

21st-century Csound

Posted Nov 8, 2012 15:31 UTC (Thu) by fsateler (subscriber, #65497) [Link] (2 responses)

That's because it wasn't. It was a license by MIT, not the MIT license.

21st-century Csound

Posted Nov 8, 2012 16:25 UTC (Thu) by bronson (guest, #4806) [Link] (1 responses)

Wow, that's a distinction the article needed to express better.

21st-century Csound

Posted Nov 12, 2012 11:34 UTC (Mon) by StudioDave (guest, #84346) [Link]

Quoting from the article:

"covered by a license from MIT"

Someone must have a copy of it somewhere. Mine disappeared with my hardcopy manual from 1989.

It was probably good enough at the time Csound first appeared, but by the late 1990s Csound developers were discussing a switch to the GPL. Eventually they agreed upon the LGPL.

Best,