User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Entitlement

Entitlement

Posted Oct 23, 2012 8:41 UTC (Tue) by cabrilo (guest, #72372)
In reply to: Entitlement by man_ls
Parent article: Heilmann: Don’t call it “open source” unless you mean it

I think the author makes the case. Obviously there is nothing wrong with just showing your code without further involvement, but from my perspective many people do it for completely wrong reasons.

I may be a selfish coder-for-hire, but my time is expensive and my tools are valuable. I only consider open sourcing my code when:

a) I want the project to grow and be seen by many eyes and I expect patches and improvements,
b) or I want somebody else to take over the project eventually - because I might find it useful in the future but currently don't have time to develop it any more.

Such projects, which are open source for selfish reasons, tend to flourish.

Projects which are put up on github or sourceforge or whatever kids these days use, just to get the free hosting or to be able to put on a resume "Leader of an open source project (and in fact the only contributor to it)" tend to be just noise (with some notable exceptions).

So, it's not about bashing people who don't engage the community, it's about telling them that if they want to have a successful and meaningful project, they should know it's a full time job.


(Log in to post comments)

Entitlement

Posted Oct 23, 2012 11:39 UTC (Tue) by man_ls (guest, #15091) [Link]

Think about the following situation, which seems to fit the case mentioned in the blog post. (I think that most of us can relate to it; at least I do.)

A developer creates some software which she hopes will bring her fame, glory and dev-cred. She spends considerable time building the package and polishing it. Patches and improvements are slow in coming, but user requests pile up. After a while help has not materialized, and she has little else to learn from it: maintaining the package does not make sense any more. But still the project is useful in its current form, or it may be some day; some people from all over the world are using it.

So the world is a better place because of the package, even in deep maintenance. But judging from the blog post the software is not "real open source". I cannot agree with that view.


Copyright © 2018, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds