User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

"developing new stuff all the time" is better for getting cool jobs

"developing new stuff all the time" is better for getting cool jobs

Posted Sep 14, 2012 15:19 UTC (Fri) by walex (subscriber, #69836)
Parent article: Distribution quotes of the week

As to stabilizing stuff, that goes against the grain, at commercial sw companies but also especially for free sw projects.

The problem is that potential employers are especially impressed by the heroes who founded and started a project, not by the lowly drones who make it work and fix the bugs and write the docs and package it.

Therefore there is a strong incentive to reinvent whatever can be reinvented, to start a project that bears your name, without contributing tedious legwork to stabilize other projects, something that does not impress employers (even if 90% of their employees are into maintenance).

As a majestic example GKH and udev, where he managed to reinvent devfs only by creating something way more complicated and fragile, and by attacking devfs. But he succeeded, got to own an important project, and this launched him into a splendid career.

Starting and owning a major project results often enough in a cool job at RedHat, Google, IBM, etc., (90%+ of Linux kernel commits are by people employed by major vendors who want to drive the action according to their agenda) so there is a really strong incentive against stability.


(Log in to post comments)

"developing new stuff all the time" is better for getting cool jobs

Posted Sep 21, 2012 16:22 UTC (Fri) by HelloWorld (guest, #56129) [Link]

How exactly is udev more "fragile" than devfs? This seems to be yet another poor trolling attempt. Udev works fine and has been for years.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds