User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Security quotes of the week

Security quotes of the week

Posted Sep 7, 2012 3:56 UTC (Fri) by josh (subscriber, #17465)
In reply to: Security quotes of the week by josh
Parent article: Security quotes of the week

(To clarify, the existence of these services seems like a bug in the first place, but the issue I mentioned seems like the most *fatal* problem with their operation other than their existence.)


(Log in to post comments)

Security quotes of the week

Posted Sep 7, 2012 10:14 UTC (Fri) by Tjebbe (subscriber, #34055) [Link]

right, the fundamental problem there is that it is 'guilty-until-proven-innocent' and not the other way around.

It's also one-directional; there do not seem to be any penalties if the 'rightsholders' make false claims (automated or not). So there is no incentive for them not to overshoot.

Security quotes of the week

Posted Sep 7, 2012 13:03 UTC (Fri) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link]

The fundamental problem here is people assume that "Intellectual Property Law" is legitimate just because it's a law or that 'people have a right to make money from their work'.


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds