User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

LGPL Libraries in Embedded Devices

LGPL Libraries in Embedded Devices

Posted Aug 12, 2012 13:23 UTC (Sun) by khim (subscriber, #9252)
In reply to: LGPL Libraries in Embedded Devices by mjg59
Parent article: Digia acquires Qt

LGPLv2.1 has requirements that GPLv2 doesn't have.

Rilly? This means all Linux distributions are blatant copyright violators because they link LGPL2.1-covered crt1.o with mass of GPLv2-licensed and GPLv3-licensed code and GPL is quite adamant about “any further restrictions”. Usual “system libraries” excuse does not help here because it's only applicable “unless that component itself accompanies the executable”.

Sorry, but no: LGPLv2.1 contains only additional permissions.

So there's plenty of code in embedded devices that's distributed under the terms of LGPLv2.1, and so you have to be concerned about the additional requirements that LGPLv2.1 contains.

Only if you use additional options given to you by LGPLv2.1… Yes, they are conditional, but so what? It's still additional options, not additional restrictions. If you feel safe distributing GPLv2 code (such as Linux kernel) then you should feel yourself equally safe distributing LGPLv2.1 code.


(Log in to post comments)

LGPL Libraries in Embedded Devices

Posted Aug 12, 2012 14:57 UTC (Sun) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]

That's why LGPLv2.1 has an explicit clause that allows you to relicense it as GPLv2.

LGPL Libraries in Embedded Devices

Posted Aug 12, 2012 15:52 UTC (Sun) by BlueLightning (subscriber, #38978) [Link]

Rilly?

The word is "really". Please don't intentionally mis-spell words, it does not lend credence to your argument.


Copyright © 2018, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds