User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Testing for kernel performance regressions

Testing for kernel performance regressions

Posted Aug 4, 2012 22:11 UTC (Sat) by dlang (subscriber, #313)
In reply to: Testing for kernel performance regressions by mikov
Parent article: Testing for kernel performance regressions

> - Should I be testing my distro's kernel or the latest mainline? If the latter, why am I testing a kernel I am not going to use for years, if at all?

you should test the mainline kernel because your distro is going to be based off of the mainline. It's because your distro is based off the mainline that you should test it.

You don't have to test every -rc kernel, but the more testing that you do, the less likely you are to run into problems when you upgrade to the latest release of your distro.

If you test only when your distro upgrades their kernel every 5 years, then finding where in the 5 years of development things went wrong is an impossible task

If you test the released kernels every 3 months, there's only 3 months of work to go through.

If you test each kernel release around the -rc3-5 range, you are even better off as the developers are currently thinking about that release, and looking for problems to fix.

> - where do I even report the bugs? Lkml? Bugzilla? My distro?

That's easy, if you are testing a mainline kernel, LKML is the best place to report bugs.


(Log in to post comments)


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds