If you "really" want atime, 2.2GB of space is like a small price to pay :P
Atime and btrfs: a bad combination?
Posted Jun 1, 2012 7:20 UTC (Fri) by ptman (subscriber, #57271)
Posted Jun 1, 2012 9:12 UTC (Fri) by Otus (subscriber, #67685)
That could only happen if you did daily snapshots as well, right?
Otherwise the COW source data should be freed as unreferenced.
Posted Jun 1, 2012 10:30 UTC (Fri) by cwillu (guest, #67268)
Posted Jun 7, 2012 14:16 UTC (Thu) by slashdot (guest, #22014)
Using atime is broken anyway since the fact that a file was accessed doesn't mean that the user read the mail (e.g. it could be the user grepping the mailbox).
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds