And I fail to see why tmpfs should be necessarily any better than a vanilla /tmp directory. Both primarily operate in RAM (tmpfs explicitly, /tmp through the buffer cache). Both spill to disk on memory pressure; probably the same disk, in fact. Instead of tmpfs, why not tweak the buffer cache? Are there any numbers comparing tmpfs with a /tmp on its own partition?
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds